Post-Performance Reflection -- Romeo and Juliet Project

My character is Romeo, the son of one of the most powerful men in Verona, he falls in love with the daughter of his family’s rivals, and a drastic chain of events after causes many deaths. I have never played Romeo before and knew it was a hard part, but I was ready for the challenge. I wanted to show his love for Juliet through my eyes and movements around her, and when I spoke about her apparent death, I tried to make it so you could hear the sadness in my voice.

            The performance went well for me, even though it was hard to hear without any microphones. I feel that I accurately represented Romeo’s sadness, and that he had given up on life in his last speech. However, if I could change anything, I would have wanted to speak a little louder so the audience could hear me clearer.

            Although I have recently done a performance of Macbeth, I feel that I have learned even more about Shakespeare in this unit, through the language and the particular way of speaking it. This will be very helpful in future ELA classes that I might have, because I will have a better way of understanding the rhythm of words and making that rhythm count in any piece of text I write.    

Reading Response -- "Macbeth" by William Shakespeare

          Humans biggest weakness is strength has always been ambition, as it is with Macbeth, who's ambition starts and ends this play. In the play Macbeth by William Shakespeare, McBeth is a fame in Scotland pick kills the king after being told by three which is that he will be king.The one thing that drives Macbeth to do this this terrible deed is ambition, but he didn't reach his reign of terror without a little pushing. Other characters in this place had their own part in this tragedy.
          For Macbeth was even persuaded to kill the King (Duncan), he had a raging ambition for greatness, and he wanted to be King more than anything.we see this throughout the play, but especially at the end when he does not deal to Macduff, who has a sword to his throat. His ambition is shown in his pride, he will not yield to anyone.
          At the beginning of the play the three witches ignite his and fission by predicting him to be king, "All hail, McBeth, thou shalt to be king hereafter!" All he's ever wanted was to be king, but prophecy does not take him over the edge, yet. Macbeth is loyal to the king and doesn't want to kill, because he states, "We will not proceed in this business; He hath honor'd me of late."
          When Macbeth tells of the witches to his wife, Lady Macbeth, she doesn't hesitate to push him over the edge. In the speeches, "Was the hope drunk..." And, "What beast was't..." She accuses him of being cowardly and unmanly, and Macbeth can't hold back anymore. Macbeth proves again that he is very noble and can't take being cowardly.
          Macbeth eventually kills Duncan, but then has to face his friends in a battle to maintain his innocence. But he goes insane and loses himself in the process. The greatest leaders in the world all had ambition, Napoleon, Abraham Lincoln, and even Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. But in every human there is a limit, and if you cross it, it could ruin you forever.
         

Picture Book Authors Note -- First Draft

          Racism has been a big part of this country's history, and there is still work to be done. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights Movement have started this immense change in the US in the 60s, but there are still many racial problems left to solve. For example, the police department has been accused many times of extreme actions against black supposed "criminals", even killing some. It   also has a big majority of Caucasian cops. Although the Police Department is not the only problem, it is the most defined and blown up out of them.

          I strived to write this children's book, because i believe that young kids should learn that the fight fall equality for all isn't over. When Polly the Pigeon, from the story, goes to tell other not colorful birds her story, it represents the kids passing this belief on, throughout their lives. Learning this at a young age will stick with them for a lifetime. 

          Although, when I'm writing this it may be a small unpublished book, i hope it's little fire warms all the kids that hear it, and makes them pass on that little flame, until we might create a bigger more ambitious one. So then, African American kids in Selma, Alabama won't be afraid to become friends with white kids, and so they can go to the same school as them, live the desegregated lives they deserve. That is a future I hope for, and try to create for the next generation.

"Brown Girl Dreaming" by Jaqueline Woodson -- Synthesis Page

Note Taking Question: Who has the power in the book?

Archetypes

Power Holder: The Mom -- She has the power because her kids and her parents respect her judgement and will do what she says because they all believe that what she says it right. This is why she has the power, someone who has power, also has power over others. She overtake the grandmother and the dad, because the kids will trust her over the others, that is true power.

Scapegoat/Outcast: The Dad -- When the Mom takes the kids away from Ohio and away from the Dad because he hates the South and she lived in the South and wanted to go back. Now the kids all believe that he is worse that anyone else because they believe that the Dad hates them and abandoned them. So when there is a problem they blame it on the Dad.

Outside Influence: The Grandmother -- She is a Jehovah's Witness, and wants so desperately for her grandchildren to be one too, which they do become. The Mom, however, does not want them to only have access to that religion. She wants the kids to choose their own.

Hope of the Family: Roman -- The family baby is the family's one hope for a new life. The baby gives the family happiness, they believe everything will be fine if the baby is alive and well. So when Roman gets led poisoning from eating paint, he gets very sick, leaving the family distraught. When he gets better, their whole mentality changes.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Notes

Negro was a normal thing to say and a correct term for black people in the 1960s, do white people have the power?

The Dad, for now, has the power to influence the kids, but not the Mom.

The Dad has no power over the children anymore. He is an outcast, they all despise him.

The children have faith in the Mom more than anyone else.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Analysis

Why is the Mom so fixated on going to live in New York?

The Mom split up with the Dad, because she wanted to go to the South, and now she wants to leave and go to New York. I believe this is because, the Mom wants her children to have a better childhood and not grow up being a lower class. She think that they are safe in NY and that is most important to her.

Why does the whole aspect of the family change when the Grandfather dies?

The Grandfather was the fun part of the kid's childhood, but now it seems that without him people moved from place to place because the are unsettled without his joyful presence around them. The family have to learn how to find another source of joy.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Connection

          Although this book is about one family in the US, it tells an outside story by explain the difference in environments, and how the country's opinion changes over racism and accepts the civil rights movement. The story connects a small, real family and their struggles, to a bigger reality surrounding them. Now, because of families and friends, just like in this story, and years of protest after, this country has improve equality between races. But, the battle is not done yet, we have to keep on fighting or racism will win.

_________________________________________________________________________________

Claims/Interpretations

-On a bigger perspective the white people have the power, but are slowly losing it to the civil right moment.

-On a smaller perspective the Mom has the power, because the children only trust in her judgement.

-The Grandfather is the joy of the family, their one consistent happiness, and when he dies, no one can settle.

This text is significant because young readers will read this and understand it's simple verse. They will learn about the civil rights movement and realized war people have do to create the equal world around them.

This text was written because the author wanted people to see the struggle of a normal family, surrounded by a bigger fight for equality. She felt that if she wrote this they would realize how much of an effect the civil rights movements had on families around the US.

Should "1984" by George Orwell Be Banned?

          Social issues in books could mean new knowledge for young adults. 1984 by George Orwell is a book about Winston, a questioning and different citizen of Oceania, where Big Brother is always watching you. Winston learns of the secret rebel organization, The Brotherhood, and starts a revolution that could change the course of the future. Although it is one of the most challenged books written, it should not be removed from middle school libraries because students are just stepping into the adult world and this book teaches them about it.

          Many students can learn about the threats of different totalitarian governments around the world, because in 1984, Oceania’s government directly represents those real world governments. One of these governments is North Korea’s; Big Brother is the dictator of Oceania, as Kim Jong Un of North Korea. “Kim has put more than 200,000 North Koreans, including children, into labor camps, according to Humans Rights Watch; they’re tortured, starved, and attacked by dogs if they get out of line.” States Bryan Brown in his Upfront article “Could Hitler Happen Again”. Big Brother mirrors this, and takes roughly the same actions. Another example is Oceania’s thought police. Which supposedly “read people’s thoughts” for any rebellious ideas and make them “vanish”. Many other totalitarian government share the same secret police or mafia to punish their people undercover. Students need to know of the threats from countries like North Korea and they enter a dangerous world where they need to be cautious.

          

          1984 is on ALA’s list of most banned books for one reason only, sexual content. This seems to scare parents so they don’t let their kids read it. However, this book’s supposed “inappropriateness” should be used as a guide to the kids about sexual dangers. The most challenged scene in the book is when Winston tell a story of him in contact with prostitution. Writes in his diary, “When I saw her in the light she was quite an old woman, fifty years old at least. But I went and did it all the same.” (Implying that he had sex with her anyway). This may be thought as encouraging it, but after, Winston states that it was the hardest thing to write down and he regrets every second of it. Instead of being badly influenced, children are being warned about the consequences you have to live with after.

          Although 1984 has been challenged many times, parents and teachers should know that although it may seem that middle school students are not ready for the content in this book, but that is the opposite, if they don’t learn in middle school then they are stepping into the adult world without any knowledge of it. Situations like the Eric Garner case that question law and rights will fly over their heads. They will be walking into a world where they will be oblivious to the problems around them.

         

          

Writing Project for Social Awareness

Write a reading response on a social issue in a literary work.

          "Should the government put people to death? Does the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution allow it? Does the death penalty deter crime? Does it discriminate against minorities?" states Patricia Smith from Upfront Magazine in the article "To Kill or Not to Kill?” These questions are just some of the debates that have been discussed for about 40 years. The Death Penalty is a punishment in which a person is put to death. Now, it is being thought of differently since a couple of lethal injections have gone terribly wrong. For example in Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Clayton Lockett, accused with murder, started "kicking, twitching, and writhing and moaning with agony" when he was given the injection. This was supposed to include a sedative, but it didn't work. In Arizona, Joseph R. Wood had more than 640 gasps before he died. Is the death penalty on its way out?

         Throughout the article, Patricia Smith describes the movement to stop the death penalty, from protests to Supreme Court rulings. "Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?” says a sign during a protest at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2008. Smith includes this because it expresses the movement it one sentence. Another piece of evidence that shows the same notion is, that the percentage of Americans that believe that the Death Penalty is right has fallen to 64% from 80% in 1999, and now 19 states have banned it. This is a step in the right direction. Although Smith's article is objective, there is a lot more evidence for the anti-death penalty side, making the article seem biased towards this opinion. However, I think it's not the author, but the debate that is biased.

          After reading this article, I have realized that many big debates or disagreements in the world, including the death penalty, are decided not through argument and constant disagreement, but through the general public. If a person who has no previous knowledge of the debate is given the two sides, he/she will pick the side with the most evidence and the most common sense. So instead of having 9 supreme judges making all the big decisions, ask the general public, because their opinion is the most valuable of them all.

Write an original literary piece (poems) responding to a specific social problem/issue.

Bullying

Bullies are victims

Of the bullies before them

When will the chain end?

Sexism

Girls are the coolest

Boys are the coolest also

Lets stop fighting now

Immigration

They have made lives here

All of us did at some point

Why not say, “welcome”

Racism

Black or Caucasian

Asian or any other

They are all the same

Drugs

Once someone tries it

It is very hard to stop

Help them recover

Observe your surroundings (school, home, neighborhood, media)

List of things I see on a daily basis that I think is unfair/not right

1.    Homelessness

2.    Drunk people

3.    Drug addicts

4.    Shootings (on TV)

5.    Elderly people with no care

6.    Racial stereotyping

7.    Sexual stereotyping

8.    Bullying

Homelessness

          When I walk to school I walk by many unfair problems, but the one that shows up the most is the homeless people that sit in alleys, in subway cars and stations, and even on a main avenue. Every New Yorker has had an experience with one or has seen one in the street, which is astonishing. We see them and walk past hoping that someone else does something to help them.  We all do it and we all feel guilty, but is there a way to fix this?

          All solutions to a problem starts with one person, one person can change the world as the popular saying goes. If that person put up a kick-starter on the Internet for a homeless shelter and asked for a goal donation to be 1,000. You tell your friends about it, your friends tell their friends and so on. Suddenly, you have 2,000 and make a homeless shelter. So that guy you see everyday when you go to work has somewhere to live, and you now don’t feel as guilty. You inspire more people and they make their own kick-starters so many more homeless people have a place to live!

          The only way this problem can be fixed is we do something about it. If we all become that person that changes the world, then who knows what else we could fix.  Homelessness can be fixed, but we need to step up and change.

Works Cited

1.    Upfront Magazine: “To Kill or Not to Kill” by Patricia Smith

Non-Fiction Reading Response -- UpFront Magazine Article

          "Should the government put people to death? Does the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution allow it? Does the death penalty deter crime? Does it discriminate against minorities?" states Patricia Smith from UpFront Magazine in the article "To Kill or Not to Kill?". These questions are just some of the debates that have been discussed for about 40 years. The Death Penalty is a punishment in which a person is put to death. Now, it is being thought of differently since a couple of lethal injections have gone terribly wrong. For example in Oklahoma State Penitentiary, Clayton Lockett, accused with murder, started "kicking, twitching, and writhing and moaning with agony" when he was given the injection. This was supposed to include a sedative, but it didn't work. In Arizona, Joseph R. Wood had more than 640 gasps before he died. Is the death penalty on its way out?
         Throughout the article, Patricia Smith describes the movement to stop the death penalty, from protests to Supreme Court rulings. "Why do we kill people who kill people to show that killing people is wrong?"says a sign during a protest at the U.S. Supreme Court in 2008. Smith includes this because it expresses the movement it one sentence. Another piece of evidence that shows the same notion is, that the percentage of Americans that believe that the Death Penalty is right has fallen to 64% from 80% in 1999, and now 19 states have banned it. This is a step in the right direction. Although Smith's article is objective, there is a lot more evidence for the anti-death penalty side, making the article seem biased towards this opinion. However, I think it's not the author, but the debate that is biased.
          After reading this article, I have realized that many big debates or disagreements in the world, including the death penalty, are decided not through argument and constant disagreement, but through the general public. If a person who has no previous knowledge of the debate is given the two sides, he/she will pick the side with the most evidence and the most common sense. So instead of having 9 supreme judges making all the big decisions, ask the general public, because their opinion is the most valuable of them all.